[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Search published articles ::
Showing 1 results for Intensive Care Units

Mohsen Ziyaeifard, Roghaye Mohammad-Taghi, Rasoul Azarfarin, Reza Abbaszadeh, Mehdi Heidari,
Volume 11, Issue 1 (3-2022)
Abstract

Abstract
Aim. This study aimed to compare the effect of Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) and Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation-Pressure Support (SIMV-PS) modes on consequence of weaning off patients from mechanical ventilator after coronary artery bypass surgery
Background. The ventilation mode used for respiratory support in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery is very important. In addition to avoiding pressure on patient's sternotomy incision, the ventilation mode should also provide the possibility of rapid weaning of patient to avoid complications caused by long-term ventilation.
Method. In a semi-experimental study, 26 patients were ventilated with ASV as the experimental group and 26 patients were ventilated with SIMV-PS mode as the control group after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Tehran, Iran. Mechanical ventilation time and endotracheal tube removal time, hemodynamic variables, and arterial blood gas analysis were compared between the two groups. Data were analyzed using an independent t-test, repeated measures ANOVA and chi-square.
Findings. Out of 52 patients, 36 (69.2 percent) were male and 16 (30.8 percent) were female. The mean time for the endotracheal tube removal was 89.42±33.83 minutes in the experimental group and 101.53±44.91 minutes in control group, which did not have a statistically significant difference (p=0.843). The mean duration of mechanical ventilation of patients in the experimental group was 483.84±158.153 minutes and in the control group, it was 541.92±257.81 minutes, which were not statistically different (p=0.332).
Conclusion. The use of ASV mode for mechanical ventilation after coronary artery bypass graft did not affect reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation and the time of endotracheal tube removal compared to SIMV-PS mode. Therefore, the use of ASV mode for respiratory support of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery should be considered according to the patient's condition and the nurses' expertise.


Page 1 from 1     

فصلنامه پرستاری قلب و عروق Iranian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.1 seconds with 25 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710