|
|
|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 2 results for Zolfaghari
Seyysed Moslem Mahdavi Shahri, Ahmad Ali Asadi Noghabi, Mitra Zolfaghari, Hamid Haghani,
Volume 2, Issue 4 (3-2014)
Abstract
Abstract Aim. The aim of this study was to evaluate nurses' views about visiting in coronary care unit (CCU). Background. Social support includes emotional and instrumental support provided by family and friends who visit the patient. Visiting is shown to be influential on patients' recovery. On the other hand, visiting time has been an issue of the medical staff, patients and visitors. Method.In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 140 nurses working in CCU participated in the study. Data were collected by the use of demographic questionnaire and "The Beliefs and Attitudes Toward Visitation in ICU Questionnaire" (BAVIQ). The data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS Version 19. Findings. Most nurses believed that visiting interferes with direct nursing care (65%), and causes nurses to spend more time in providing information to the patients’ families (82.8%). Most nurses (85%) did not desire to liberalize the visiting policy of their unit. Conclusion. The results of the study showed that CCU nurses have rather negative viewpoints toward visiting and open visiting policy that is in conflict with emotional needs of patients and their families.
Amirhosein Abdi-Doorbashi, Mitra Zolfaghari, Azam Mahmoudi, Abbas Mehran,
Volume 5, Issue 1 (6-2016)
Abstract
Abstract
Aim. This study
aimed to examine the effect of application of Braden pressure ulcers risk
assessment tool on performance of critical care nurses.
Background. Pressure ulcer
is a common phenomenon in patients admitted to intensive care unit. The
management of pressure ulcers in these patients is a challenging task.
Therefore, pressure ulcer prediction tools are used when dealing with these
patients.
Method. This
quasi-experimental study was conducted in the intensive care units. The study
sample consisted 68 critical care nurses working inintensive care units of
selected hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2013. After
determining the sample size and obtaining permission from theethics committee
of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, the participants were recruited
through convenience sampling based on inclusion criteria. Critical care nurses
of two intensive care units of general hospitals of Tehran University of
Medical Sciences were selected as experimental and control group. In both
groups, after collecting demographic characteristics, their performance in the
management of patients who were at risk for pressure ulcers was evaluated by the
checklist whose validity and reliability was evaluated by the faculty members
of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The data were analyzed by
descriptive and inferential statistics in SPSS version 19.
Findings. There was no
statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic
characteristics. After the intervention, the mean score of nurses performance
in the experimental group was 66.21±0.47 and that of control group was
62.59±1.31 (p≤0.0001). After intervention, all nurses in the experimental group
had very good performance and nurses in the control group had good performance.
Conclusion. Using the
pressure ulcers risk assessment tool (Braden scale) increases the sensitivity
of critical care nurses to the risk of ulceration in the intensive care unit
patients and forces them to comply with the standard caring measures and
consequently, lead to prevention of bed sores. It is recommended to use this
tool in order to enhance the care management of patients prone to pressure sore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
