|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 2 results for Developmental Care
Mona Alinejad-Naine, Volume 3, Issue 1 (6-2014)
Abstract
Abstract Aim. This paper reviews various positions for neonates admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), describes benefits and disadvantages of each position and suggests a clinical guideline to improve development. Background. It has been known that development of active muscle tone begins at 36 weeks gestation, when the baby achieves a postural state known as physiological flexion. Premature babies suffer from low muscle tone because they have missed out on some or all of the substantial stages of muscle tone development in the uterus. Without appropriate intervention these babies may experience head flattening and cranial molding. Without support, gravity causes preterm babies shoulders and hips flatten onto the bed, often called ‘frog leg position’ and ‘W arm position’. This can result in inappropriate or delayed development and mobility challenges including the inability to crawl, stand, walk and problem in fine motor skills such as hand-mouth co-ordination. Method. In this literature review, papers published during the last 15 years, were searched out through search engines and data bases: Science Direct, Google Scholar, Ebsco, Pub Med, Ovid, Proquest based on which 16 papers about neonatal positioning during nursing care were selected. Also, three neonatal textbook were used. Result. One of the earliest neurodevelopmental strategies in the NICU is therapeutic positioning. Positioning of premature infant is an essential neonatal nursing care. These positions are supine, prone, side-lying, and head up tilted position. Many studies have shown that a variety of outcomes can be affected by different body positioning of premature infants. Every position has its own advantages and disadvantages, so each infant should be individually assessed and positioned according to condition, preferences and behavioral cues. Position changes should be slow and steady, so that the infant doesn’t become distressed and dislodgement of invasive and monitoring equipment can be avoided. Whenever possible, an infant should be touched gently and talked to before changing their position. Conclusion. It is necessary to ensure that preterm and sick neonates receive individualized positioning appropriate for their musculoskeletal development in order to minimize complications. Infants receiving developmentally supportive care have been demonstrated better medical outcomes including shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and supplemental oxygen support, earlier oral feeding, and shorter hospitalization.
Zahra Jafari, Atefeh Shamsi, Volume 14, Issue 1 (3-2025)
Abstract
Abstract
Aim. The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence on the impact of different components of developmental care on physiological, nutritional, behavioral, and family outcomes of infants with heart disease and to identify the challenges of implementing this care in cardiac intensive care units.
Background. Congenital heart disease is the most common congenital anomaly in newborns, and affected infants, especially those undergoing open-heart surgery and prolonged hospitalization in the cardiac intensive care unit, are at significant risk of neurodevelopmental delays. Developmental care has been proposed as a family-centered approach to reduce environmental stress and support infant brain development in this high-risk population, but its implementation in neonatal cardiac unit remains challenging and limited.
Method. In this narrative review, 15 research and review articles published between 2016 and 2025 that directly addressed developmental care, neurobehavioral outcomes, and family involvement in infants with heart disease were screened and analyzed.
Findings. Findings were categorized into four main areas: 1) the role of developmental care in hemodynamic stability and reduction of mechanical ventilation duration, 2) the effectiveness of interventions on feeding patterns and weight gain, 3) the role of parental involvement and Kangaroo care in reducing stress and improving behavioral scores, and 4) barriers to implementing developmental care in cardiac intensive care units, including lack of training, resources, and competing clinical priorities.
Conclusion. The available evidence, although mainly derived from observational and qualitative studies with limited sample sizes, fairly uniformly supports the positive impact of developmental care on short-term outcomes in infants with heart disease. The development of standard clinical guidelines, training of nursing staff, and active family participation are among the main priorities for improving this care in the future.
|
|