|
|
|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 2 results for Lotfian
Sara Lotfian, Fatemeh Kermani, Dr Pardis Moradnejad, Haleh Dadgostar, Maryam Talebi,
Volume 10, Issue 1 (3-2021)
Abstract
Abstract
Aim. This study was conducted to compare the prevalence of neck pain and disability among nurses in intensive care and general wards.
Background. Nursing is known as one of the ten occupations that are associated with musculoskeletal complications. In has been reported that neck and shoulder disorder are more common among nurses with high physical workload than those with low physical workload. So far, few studies have been performed on neck problems in nurses working at intensive care unit.
Method. In this cross-sectional descriptive-comparative study, 40 nurses from intensive care units and 40 nurses from general wards of Rasool Akram hospital, Tehran, Iran, were selected by convenience sampling method. Data collection in both groups was done through completing a checklist of demographic characteristics, Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NDPS) questionnaires by participants. The data was analyzed in SPSS version 22 using descriptive and inferential statistics.
Findings. The prevalence of neck pain and disability (measured by NDI and NPDS) in all nurses was 77.5 percent and 60 percent, respectively; 90 percent and 70 percent in nurses working at the intensive care units, and 65 percent and 50 percent in nurses working at general wards. The difference in scores measured by NDI was statistically significant between nurses working at the intensive care units and those working at general wards (P=0.014).
Conclusion. The prevalence of neck pain was significantly high in nurses, which could be due to their high workload that requires appropriate preventive measures and reduction of their physical workload.
Sara Lotfian, Hasan Arian, Rasool Azarfarin, Hooman Bakhshandeh, Pardis Moradnejad,
Volume 11, Issue 1 (3-2022)
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Aim. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of early mobilization protocol on the strength of diaphragmatic muscle and other inspiratory muscles after open heart surgery.
Background. Early mobilization is recommended as a safe protocol after open heart surgery to decrease hospital stay and post-op respiratory complications; however, our knowledge about its effect on improving respiratory muscles strength is limited.
Methods. This is a randomized single-blinded clinical trial conducted on 80 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery and/or valvular surgery that were randomly assigned to experimental group (postoperative early mobilization) and control group (routine physiotherapy). On the day before surgery and the day before leaving intensive care unit (ICU), two scores were measured for assessing diaphragmatic muscle strength: maximum inspiratory pressure (PI max) and Strength index (S index). Hemodynamic parameters were also measured and compared.
Findings. According to both PI max and S index, diaphragmatic muscle strength decreased from 77.28 to 59.53 cmH2O in patients after surgery, but the changes in the experimental group was less than the control group, which indicates a significant improvement in the strength of the diaphragm muscle in the experimental group (p≤0.0001). Hemodynamic changes after surgery (lower blood pressure and increased heart rate) occurred in both groups without any significant clinical effect.
Conclusion. Early mobilization after cardiac surgery has positive effect on the strength of diaphragmatic muscle and is also safe as shown to have no adverse effect on hemodynamic parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
